the fascist control of 'physics' visavis Planck, Maxwell, Di
Envoi de Millennium Twain le 09 Mars 2006 05:54:59:
here is the letter on Aether compare SED which was posted to
AenertialAether, but not to NuclearStructure ...
MT
~~
~~~~
this, from 1997!
re-discovered on the internet ...
Millennium
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AenertialAether/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NuclearStructure/
~~~~
~~~~~
Over the past 24 or so hours I have received several items of
email from one "Millennium Twain" (who usually mails from the
-- invalid -- address of none@...). These
messages have been about free energy, the "aenertial aether", the
conspiracy to suppress such science and various similar topics.
The text of these messages is presented below.
-- acb
Message-ID: <33A46FDF.3D70@...>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 14:42:52 -0800
From: "M.Twain"
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mmalovic@...
Subject: Ether Drift Experiments.
Hello Miodrag,
Yeah, "The Michelson-Morley-Miller experiments ALL showed
ether drift."?The problem is that none of the experiments were
sensitive enough to?detect the small measurements required.
[And the results were in random?directions, as you say.] That is,
the error bars were greater than the?measurements needed and
predicted.
Worse, all the results of the experiments were politically slanted
-- in?order to discredit the aether, to control the emerging
knowledge of the?structure of the atom, and to build up
Germany's Einstein.
Worse yet, none of the players (Michelson, Morley, Miller,
Poincare,?Einstein, etc.) had an existing theory or model of the
aether! Thus the?experiments, even if they had sensitivity, could
produce no results as?there were no predictions which had any
objective meaning.
Basically, the problem was political. An aether theory would be
by?definition a theory of the continuum (ref Mach). This would
overturn?the fascist control of knowledge visavis Planck,
Maxwell, Dirac, etc.?which required that knowledge of
electromagnetism absolutely must not be?integrated with
knowledge of the structure of the atom!
Even today, with the world in revolution/renaissance, the covert
government/industry machine refuses to relinquish this?paradigm. They?are prepared to admit that Einstein and
everyone was wrong, but only if?we agree that the lie of
mathematical ZPF is the new ruling paradigm --?promoted by
Bernie Haisch of Lockheed Missiles and Space Company, and
Harold Puthoff (CIA-sponsored research scientist formerly of
Stanford Research Institute).
Only government-controlled large corporations will be allowed
to?research and build cold-fusion, free-energy, superluminal-
communication and other technologies -- if we agree to their
counter-intelligence.
When (the Frenchman) Sagnac built the world's first laser
interferometer, and thus proved the existance of the inertial
aether continuum (if not its structure) -- this technology was
acquired and?controlled by the world's aerospace industries.
It resulted in little?public or theoretical discussion, and no
aether theory modeling.
The French have always known about the German-sponsored
American?counter-intelligence operation of Quantum Mechanics
and Relativity?Theory built up by Planck, Einstein, Sommerfeld,
Schrodinger, Dirac, and?everyone. Poincare was quite clear
about it at first -- SRT was?nonsense he said. But the French
were out-voted, and came along. If?you read the 1905 to 1910
discussions (and later book) of?superluminality by Sommerfeld
(translated from the German) and Brillouin?(translated from the
French) -- they stated, not publicly or loudly,?that?obviously
the speed of light limitation of SRT was nonsense (and they
showed exactly where and when nature violated it) -- but said
that they?thought that the Planck/Einstein political dogma was
important and they would not contest its rise!
That, of course, didn't stop the French from continuing R&D
specifically?into those areas barred by the counter-intelligence,
nor the Germans?(and others) who were the first to conduct and
publish superluminal?tunnelling experiments.
Millennium Twain
..
.
Réponses:
Répondre
|
|
